Plenty of things stay the exact same in Florida: moisture, an endless influx of seniors, and expensive Palm Beach estate that is real.

Gaming laws in the Sunshine State, however, never fall into that category, and have develop into a never-ending invasion of brand new amendments and challenges to existing rules.

Florida gambling laws are going to change, in the course of time.

There’s just too much on the table for the status quo to be maintained: the Seminole Tribe’s compact is up for renewal, there’s the ongoing concern over whether resort-style casinos ought to be permitted in their state, and the chance for providing more gambling legal rights to horse and dog racing tracks.

A proposition that could have originally served to expand parts of the current compact with the Seminoles for another 12 months transformed as a larger, more complex piece of legislation on Wednesday, as amendments switched it into a broad gaming bill that could change many facets of Florida’s gaming policy.

The bill was originally proposed by Senate Regulated Industries Chairman Rob Bradley (R-Fleming Island), but by the time it had been amended and brought up to a vote, Bradley himself voted against it.

Bill Would Extend Seminole Compact

Originally, Bradley’s bill (SB 7088) would simply have extended the agreement that is five-year the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida for another year.

That agreement is placed to operate out on July 1, and Bradley had hoped that such a measure could give the state more time to negotiate with the tribe. The move would have assured that the Seminoles would still have exclusive rights to run blackjack along with other card that is banked in the state for another year.

But over the course of a two-hour meeting, Bradley’s committee took that easy bill and loaded it along with other measures related to Florida’s gambling landscape. Other state senators added amendments to your bill that will allow tracks that are greyhound offer other gambling choices, like poker and slots, even when they stopped holding races, for instance.

After that was proposed, another Senator suggested letting jai-alai frontons and horse racing tracks to accomplish equivalent.

‘This is what’s great for the goose is great for the gander,’ said Senator Oscar Braynon (D-Miami Gardens). ‘ If we’re doing it for starters, we must do it for all.’

That amendment passed away the committee by a 7-5 vote. Another approved amendment would require that 10 percent of slot profits at new racetrack casinos, known as ‘racinos,’ will be used to subsidize horse rushing purses at Tampa Bay Downs.

Final Bill Could Look Completely Different from Committee Proposal

In the long run, the overall bill (amendments included) passed away through the committee by a 7-5 vote.

But Bradley himself ended up being among the five Senators whom voted against the measure, which he intended to be described as a very restricted piece of legislation. Still, he noted that even the variation of the bill that did pass through his committee would not necessarily be something the full Senate might eventually approve this session.

‘we would suspect that whenever we have a gaming bill come out of the Senate that it will look probably slightly different than exactly what you saw leave this committee today,’ Bradley said. ‘What you see is a few elements that continue become in play.’

A proposal by State House Majority Leader Dana Young (R-Hillsborough County) to allow two resort casinos in Broward and Miami-Dade counties was scaled back, though the resorts are expected to be added back in via an amendment that would require voters or county commissions in those counties to approve adding those resorts at the same time.

Netherlands Looking to Modernize On Line Gambling Regulations